Marijuana Drug Trafficking in Georgia

As our country slowly moves towards decriminalizing marijuana, it is easy to fall into the trap of believing that the law currently does not take marijuana-related charges seriously. In Georgia, marijuana is still very much illegal, and you can be prosecuted for trafficking marijuana even if you live in a state in which it has been legalized.

With a deep understanding of the intricacies of drug law in Georgia, Bixon Law Firm is committed to advocating for individuals caught in the legal complexities surrounding marijuana-related offenses. We recognize that despite shifting attitudes towards marijuana legalization in other states, Georgia’s laws remain stringent, and trafficking charges can carry severe consequences. Bixon Law Firm works tirelessly to navigate the legal system on behalf of our clients, offering expert guidance and unwavering support to ensure fair treatment and the best possible outcome for those entangled in marijuana trafficking cases.

Georgia takes a very hardline approach to prosecuting drug charges. The criteria for a Marijuana Trafficking charge are strikingly broad, and the punishment for trafficking marijuana is more severe than even voluntary manslaughter.

Read our page regarding cocaine trafficking here.

Legal Definition of Marijuana Trafficking in Georgia

Under Georgia law O.C.G.A. §16-13-31(c), a person commits the offense of Trafficking in Marijuana when he or she sells, manufactures, grows, delivers, brings into this state, or has possession of a quantity of marijuana exceeding ten pounds.

There is very little difference between a trafficking charge and the lesser charge of O.C.G.A §16-13-30(j) “Purchase, possession, manufacture, distribution, or sale of controlled substances or marijuana”, which states that “it shall be unlawful for any person to possess, have under his or her control, manufacture, deliver, distribute, dispense, administer, purchase, sell, or possess with intent to distribute marijuana.” These are essentially all the same criteria as the Trafficking charge, with the only difference being the weight threshold. Once that ten-pound threshold has been exceeded, the trafficking charge can be applied.

The important thing to understand is that while conventional wisdom would indicate that you must participate in the sale or business side of trafficking marijuana to meet the charge’s criteria, in Georgia possession alone of marijuana in excess of ten pounds will put you in jeopardy of this charge. The court does not have to prove intent to sell or even knowledge of the weight of the marijuana to convict you of this upgraded felony.

The weight of these potential legal implications proves the need for comprehensive legal representation from Bixon Law Firm. Our commitment extends beyond legal expertise, we offer compassion and support to navigate the complexities of the legal system, always striving for the best possible outcome for our clients.

Penalties for Trafficking Marijuana

While most felonies have a default sentence of prison time amounting to “not less than one year nor more than ten years, Georgia’s minimum sentence for marijuana trafficking is five times that amount, with a heavy non-negotiable fine. O.C.G.A. §16-13-31(c)(1) states: “If the quantity of marijuana involved is in excess of ten pounds, but less than 2,000 pounds, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of five years and shall pay a fine of $100,000.00”

Furthermore, there are three tiers of severity for trafficking once you surpass the 10lb threshold, each with dramatically increased punishments that you may face.

While a skilled defense attorney may be able to bring into question the weight of the marijuana seized, if the court can prove that the marijuana possessed crossed the threshold from 9 pounds to 10 pounds, you will be facing an additional 5 years behind bars and a $100,000 debt.

Legal Defenses Against Marijuana Trafficking Allegations

Suppression of Evidence

A trafficking charge presents unique challenges, in that the evidence brought to the court is entirely objective- there is no subjective way to evaluate ten pounds. Therefore, the best defense is to try to eliminate the evidence from consideration by identifying breaches in the protocol by the state. The most common suppression issues revolve around illegal stops and searches by law enforcement.

Weight

The foundation of a trafficking charge in Georgia is the weight of the drug confiscated. Therefore, the most important element of a marijuana trafficking charge to verify is that the weight of drugs reported by the investigating officer is accurate. There have been many cases in which the weight reported to the court had been inflated and upon the defense counsel’s challenge of the weight the charges have been dismissed.

Challenging the accuracy of the reported drug weight is just one avenue of defense against marijuana trafficking charges. Another crucial aspect to scrutinize is the chain of custody of the seized drugs. Any break in the chain of custody can cast doubt on the integrity of the evidence and weaken the prosecution’s case. Additionally, exploring potential violations of constitutional rights during the search and seizure process can provide grounds for suppression of evidence. A skilled defense attorney from Bixon Law Firm will meticulously investigate every aspect of the case to uncover any weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence and build a robust defense strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of the client’s case.

Actual Possession vs Constructed Possession

Drugs can be “possessed” in two different ways: Actual Possession or Constructed Possession.

Actual Possession is the more literal definition, in which an individual is physically holding the drugs or they are within arm’s reach. In Actual Possession, an individual could immediately produce or distribute drugs. This can be as simple as having a bag of marijuana in your pocket.

Constructed Possession is when you are not able to immediately produce the drugs, but you have reasonable access to possessing them in a hypothetical situation. An example of this could be if you share a home with others, and your roommate has a bag of marijuana in their room. While you are not personally physically holding the marijuana, you have access to it and could hypothetically distribute it. In the eyes of the law, you are technically in constructed possession of the marijuana in your roommate’s room. 

Although both forms of possession are legally permissible pieces of evidence in a courtroom, a jury of common citizens will be much less likely to convict on constructed possession than actual possession. We are experienced in leveraging this to obtain a more favorable plea deal for our clients.

Unlawful Stop

Oftentimes, trafficking charges arise from a traffic stop that results in a car being searched. It’s important to note that traffic stops are legal only if there was a traffic violation observed- if, for example, a police officer has probable cause obtained from conducting surveillance on a defendant’s home, this is not grounds for a traffic stop, regardless of what they observed. Any traffic violation (from running a stop sign to having a tail light out) is grounds for a police officer to pull you over. In the absence of a traffic violation that led to the stop, however, we can argue to have any evidence found in your automobile dismissed, and said evidence cannot be used against you in the future for a similar charge in that jurisdiction.

Lack of Knowledge

It is not unheard of for a drug smuggler to utilize an unsuspecting victim to aid in their trafficking. In certain circumstances, it can be argued that the individual was unaware of what exactly they were in possession of. While O.C.G.A. § 16-13-54.1 explicitly states that the defendant does not need to be aware of how much marijuana they are in possession of to be charged with trafficking, there is still a reasonable defense in arguing that an individual was unaware of what they were trafficking. An example may be an individual signing for a package with drugs, who may be unaware of what they were signing for.

The lack of knowledge defense can be a powerful tool in challenging marijuana trafficking charges. While the law may not require explicit awareness of the quantity of drugs possessed, establishing that the individual was genuinely unaware of the nature of the substance can raise doubts about their culpability. This defense strategy often hinges on demonstrating the defendant’s lack of intent to participate in illegal activities.

Specific Cases of Marijuana Drug Trafficking

In the case of Wilson v. State, 312 Ga. App. 166, 11 FCDR 3137, 718 S.E.2d 31, A jury found Justin Thomas Wilson guilty of trafficking in marijuana, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, and possession of marijuana. 

A package containing 12.46 pounds of marijuana arrived at a post office in Hall County addressed to “Abby.” The post office mistakenly notified Abby Massaro of 1930 Vineyard Way. Ms. Massaro collected the package from the post office, discovered the marijuana, and contacted the police. A law enforcement officer, dressed as a postal carrier, performed a controlled delivery of the package to Wilson’s residence, with other officers waiting nearby. Justin Wilson answered the door and told the undercover officer that Abby was not at home but that “the package was expected and he would sign for it.” Wilson accepted delivery and was immediately arrested. Wilson told the officers that his roommate, Daniel Park, had mentioned that he was having a package containing marijuana shipped to the apartment. 

Wilson also stated that he believed the package was ultimately intended to be delivered to David Salinas, a friend of Park. Both Park and Salinas were convicted during separate jury trials of trafficking in marijuana, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, and possession of marijuana.

Wilson appealed on the grounds that he was unaware of the precise nature of the drugs in his possession, but this appeal was denied.

In the case of Wiggins v. State, 331 Ga.App. 447, 771 S.E.2d 135, Kennesaw Police undercover narcotics agent Samone Burnes received an anonymous tip about Wiggins “selling narcotics at his residence and storing narcotics there.” About a week later, Agent Burnes had a telephone conversation with the anonymous informant, who told her that Wiggins had an “indoor mushroom grow,” that he was selling “approximately 50 pounds of marijuana from his residence” each week, that the informant had seen the drugs in Wiggins’s home, and that there were cameras on the exterior of the house. 

Agent Burnes went to Wiggins’s residence to begin a surveillance operation. Approximately ten minutes after she arrived, Agent Burnes observed a male, later identified as Wiggins, and a female leave the house and drive away in Wiggins’s truck. Agent Burnes followed them, and she noticed that Wiggins was “driving pretty fast” and a traffic stop was initiated. While conducting the stop, the agent searched Wiggins’s truck because he smelled the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle. In doing so, the agent discovered a bag of marijuana, which weighed 19.7 grams. Ultimately, Agent Burnes requested and obtained a search warrant for Wiggins’s home, and in executing the warrant, KPD agents discovered numerous controlled substances and related paraphernalia. 

After hiring a defense attorney to appeal the case, Wiggins contended that the evidence presented against him was invalid. His counsel argued that the search warrant was invalid because the supporting affidavit did not give rise to sufficient probable cause to suggest that he was running a drug distribution operation out of his home. 

The trial court agreed with the defense attorney’s claim that the evidence was secured improperly and noted that it was not “impressed with Agent Burnes’s conduct or her investigation because there was none.” The court also indicated that it was “very concerned” about Agent Burnes’s failure to provide the magistrate with a time frame of when the reported drug sales occurred. Lastly, the court indicated that it did not consider ten minutes to be an adequate amount of surveillance. Ultimately, the court agreed with the defense counsel that the evidence was secured improperly, and was forced to reverse the conviction regardless of what the evidence showed.

Contact Bixon Law for Legal Aid Today

With careful examination of the circumstances surrounding the alleged trafficking, including the individual’s level of involvement and awareness, a skilled defense attorney can construct a compelling argument to mitigate or dismiss the charges. Bixon Law Firm’s experienced legal team is adept at leveraging nuanced defense strategies to protect the rights and interests of its clients facing marijuana trafficking allegations.

If you have been charged with drug trafficking, give Bixon Law a call today to speak to one of our experienced criminal defense lawyers. We will vigorously defend your legal rights and advocate on your behalf to have your case dismissed or the charges against you reduced. As experienced trial attorneys, we are also not afraid to take your case to trial if necessary. We represent clients in Atlanta and throughout the state of Georgia. We are lawyers who are committed to helping people in difficult situations and we invite you to call us at (404) 551-5684 for a free consultation today. 

Check out our YouTube video for more info!