Cocaine Trafficking Charges in Georgia

  •   None
cocaine trafficking

At Bixon Law, located in Atlanta Georgia, it is our duty to meticulously scrutinize every facet of a cocaine trafficking charge. Navigating the complexities of a cocaine trafficking charge is one of the most challenging and high-stakes endeavors in criminal defense. 

When it comes to drug crimes, Georgia uses a three-tiered approach, with escalating punishments: Drug Possession, Drug Possession with Intent to Distribute, and Drug Trafficking.

Drug trafficking is the most serious tier of drug crime in Georgia, and comes with a mandatory minimum sentence and a large fine. Drug crimes escalate from intent to distribute the drug to trafficking depending on the weight of the drug, with each individual drug having both its own weight limits and its own corresponding punishment. Cocaine is tied with Meth for the highest punishment for drug crimes in Georgia. At the high end of potential charges (possession of 400 grams of cocaine or more), you are looking at a 25-year minimum sentence and a $1,000,000 minimum fine. For context, the minimum sentence for voluntary manslaughter is 25x smaller at a one-year minimum sentence.

For charges involving Marijuana in Georgia, read our page here.

Legal Definition of Trafficking Cocaine

Under Georgia law O.C.G.A. §16-13-31(a), a person commits the offense of Trafficking in Cocaine when he or she sells, manufactures, delivers, or brings into this state or who is in possession of 28 grams or more of cocaine or of any mixture with a purity of 10 percent or more of cocaine.

There are three tiers of severity for trafficking once you surpass the 28g threshold, each with dramatically increased punishments that you may face.

The severity of the punishment escalates with the quantity of cocaine involved, ranging from mandatory minimum sentences to potential life imprisonment. This underscores the critical importance of thoroughly examining the evidence and crafting a strategic defense tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. As such, understanding the nuances of the law and building a robust defense strategy is paramount in navigating the complexities of cocaine trafficking charges in Georgia.

Code SectionWeightPunishment
O.C.G.A. §16-13-31(a)(A)28g – 200g Cocaine10 year minimum jail sentence $200,000 fine
O.C.G.A. §16-13-31(a)(B)200g – 400g Cocaine15 year minimum jail sentence $300,000 fine
O.C.G.A. §16-13-31(a)(C)400g+ Cocaine25 year minimum jail sentence $1,000,000 fine


Defenses Against Trafficking Charges

Suppression of Evidence

A drug trafficking charge presents unique challenges, in that the main evidence brought to the court is entirely objective- there is no subjective way to evaluate how many grams of the drug there are, it just is what it is. Therefore, the best defense is to try to eliminate the cocaine’s weight as evidence from consideration altogether by identifying breaches in the protocol by the state. We have successfully gotten cocaine trafficking cases dismissed by suppression of evidence by our knowledge of the laws surrounding evidence, its acquisition, and chain of custody.

A meticulous examination of the law enforcement procedures can reveal critical errors that may render the evidence inadmissible. By demonstrating that the evidence has been mishandled or that the defendant’s rights were violated during the acquisition process, we can effectively challenge the prosecution’s case. This rigorous approach not only bolsters the defense but also underscores the importance of upholding legal standards and protecting individual rights within the judicial system.

Weight

The foundation of a drug trafficking charge in Georgia is the weight of the drug confiscated. Therefore, the most important element of a cocaine trafficking charge to verify is that the weight of drugs reported by the investigating officer was accurate. There have been many cases in which the cocaine’s weight reported to the court had been inflated, and upon the defense counsel’s challenge of the weight of the drug, the charges have been dismissed.

Chain of Custody

Ensuring the integrity of the chain of custody is crucial in defending against cocaine trafficking charges. Any break or inconsistency in the chain of custody can raise doubts about the authenticity and reliability of the evidence. Drug defense attorneys often scrutinize every step of the evidence handling process, from its initial seizure to its presentation in court, to identify any lapses that could cast doubt on the prosecution’s case. By highlighting discrepancies or breaches in the chain of custody, defense counsel can weaken the prosecution’s argument and potentially secure a more favorable outcome for their client.

Purity

Cocaine is the only drug that Georgia applies a purity requirement to under O.C.G.A § 16-13-31’s drug trafficking statute. If the cocaine can be proven to be less than 10%, the rules change quite a bit in a very important way. Hidden underneath the drug statutes above is a clause that reads: “If the total weight of the mixture multiplied by the percentage of cocaine contained in the mixture exceeds any of the quantities of cocaine specified”. So if your cocaine is exactly 10% pure, it will take 28g to be convicted of drug trafficking. If, however, your cocaine mixture is exactly 9.9% pure when confiscated, it will take 280g to be convicted of drug trafficking.

Actual Possession vs Constructed Possession

Drugs can be “possessed” in two different ways, actual possession vs constructed possession.

Actual possession is the more literal definition, in which an individual is physically holding the drugs or they are within arm’s reach. In Actual Possession of a drug, an individual could immediately produce or distribute drugs. This can be as simple as having a bag of cocaine in your pocket.

Constructed Possession of a drug is when you are not able to immediately produce the drugs, but you have reasonable access to possessing them in a hypothetical situation. An example of this could be if you share a home with others, and your roommate has a bag of cocaine in their room. While you are not personally physically holding the cocaine, you have access to the drug and could hypothetically distribute it. In the eyes of the law, you are technically in constructed possession of the cocaine or any other drugs in your roommate’s room.

Although both forms of drug possession are legally permissible pieces of evidence in a courtroom, a jury of common citizens in a trial will be much less likely to convict on constructed possession of a drug than they would be for actual possession of the drug. We are experienced in leveraging this to obtain a more favorable plea deal for our clients facing drug charges.

Unlawful Stop

Oftentimes, drug trafficking charges arise from a traffic stop that results in a car being searched, and drugs are found. It’s important to note that traffic stops are legal only if there was a traffic violation observed before the drugs were found- if, for example, a police officer has probable cause obtained from conducting surveillance on a defendant’s home and noticing drug-related activity, this is not grounds for a traffic stop, regardless of what drug-related activity they observed. Any traffic violation (from running a stop sign to having a taillight out) is grounds for a police officer to pull you over. In the absence of a traffic violation that led to the drugs found during the stop, however, we can argue to have any cocaine found in your automobile dismissed as evidence, and the possession of the cocaine cannot be used against you in the future for a similar drug charge within that jurisdiction.

Lack of Knowledge

It is not unheard of for a drug smuggler to utilize an unsuspecting person to aid in their trafficking. In certain circumstances, it can be argued that the individual was unaware of what drug they were in possession of. While O.C.G.A. § 16-13-54.1 explicitly states that the defendant does not need to be aware of how much cocaine they are in possession of to be charged with drug trafficking, there is still a reasonable defense in arguing that an individual was unaware of what drug they were trafficking. An example may be an individual signing for a package with drugs, who may be unaware of what exactly they were signing for.

Case Law Spotlight

In the case of Barnett v. State, A jury found Reginald Clay Barnett guilty of trafficking in cocaine, but upon appeal, the defense attorney was able to get the drug charge reduced to the lesser “possession of cocaine” offense.

Barnett was stopped for a traffic violation of having an inoperative headlight, and upon stopping the defendant the arresting officer noticed that he smelled of alcohol, had bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and was nervous. The defendant admitted that he had been drinking, and a field sobriety test was executed. The defendant performed poorly on the test and was arrested for a DUI.

Because there were no valid drivers for the car while Barnett was being arrested, the arresting officer elected to impound the car. Standard practice for impounding a car is to take inventory of the contents prior to impounding it, and while taking inventory the officers found crack cocaine in a Cheetos bag that had been placed in a slit that had been made in the back of the passenger side seat.

33.9 grams of cocaine were recovered, passing the statutory requirement of 28g to become a cocaine trafficking charge. The cocaine was measured to be 82.5 percent cocaine. Because this meant that the total quantity of pure cocaine therefore only measured 27.9675g. The defense attorney argued that this meant the cocaine technically weighed less than 28g, and the court was forced to reduce the drug charge to a lesser cocaine possession charge.

Contact Bixon Law Today

If you have been charged with trafficking cocaine or any other drug charge, give Bixon Law a call today to speak to one of our experienced criminal defense lawyers. We will vigorously defend your legal rights and advocate on your behalf to have your case dismissed or the charges against you reduced. As experienced trial attorneys, we are also not afraid to take your case to trial if necessary. We represent clients in Atlanta and throughout the state of Georgia. We are lawyers who are committed to helping people in difficult situations and we invite you to call us at (404) 551-5684 for a free consultation today. Your future is too important to leave to chance. Take the first steps towards protecting your future; call us today and let us fight for you.